No problem Cedars.
How many more talk about it the better!
here is some information.. the following prospectus seems to give evidence that the watch tower society is attending an investment conference less than a month after their november 8th court date over the bond motion (see page 4, bottom right).. http://www.imn.org/2012/etm1324/pdfs/etm1324_prospectus.pdf.
read into that what you will.. i would rather not pass comment in case i am accused of sensationalism.. .
cedars.
No problem Cedars.
How many more talk about it the better!
here is some information.. the following prospectus seems to give evidence that the watch tower society is attending an investment conference less than a month after their november 8th court date over the bond motion (see page 4, bottom right).. http://www.imn.org/2012/etm1324/pdfs/etm1324_prospectus.pdf.
read into that what you will.. i would rather not pass comment in case i am accused of sensationalism.. .
cedars.
Yes Cedars.
I had mentioned this information here:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/scandals/239728/1/Watchtower-on-Global-Indexing-ETFs
http://testemunhasdejeova.forumeiros.com.pt/t992-a-organizacao-tj-exposta-na-cbc-canadian-broadcasting-corporation#11892.
city contributes $150,000 to jehovahs witnesses convention .
by ariella montioctober 22, 2012 | posted in: city council, news, the latest | 0 responsesduring a closed session a month ago raleigh city councilors approved a $150,000 contribution to the christian congregation of jehovahs witnesses convention that will be held next year at the pnc arena.. the city has been contributing money toward the event since it first came to raleigh seven years ago.. this is not new, said city manager russell allen.
he said the event has been built into the citys annual budget for awhile.. the approval came during a closed session after the regular sept. 18 city council meeting.
By ARIELLA MONTI October 22, 2012 | Posted in: City Council, News, The Latest | 0 Responses
During a closed session a month ago Raleigh City Councilors approved a $150,000 contribution to the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses convention that will be held next year at the PNC Arena.
The city has been contributing money toward the event since it first came to Raleigh seven years ago.
“This is not new,” said City Manager Russell Allen. He said the event has been built into the city’s annual budget for awhile.
The approval came during a closed session after the regular Sept. 18 City Council meeting. The meeting minutes obtained by the Record, posted below, read, “City Manager Allen stated the Council knew his feelings about the request.”
He declined when asked to elaborate on those feelings during a later interview.
The Greater Raleigh Convention and Visitor’s Bureau and the Centennial Authority also contribute funding to the convention.
Dave Olsen, PNC Arena general manager, said that this is the only religiously affiliated event at the area that has a partnership with the city, the visitor’s bureau and the Centennial Authority.
Allen said that other religiously-affiliated groups and organizations typically use the convention center and could qualify for similar business development funding or discounts. But, this is the only event that is held at the arena and also receives some public funding.
According to the backup documents provided with the meeting minutes, the convention received a total of $275,000 in 2011.
The funding covers a portion of the arena rental plus expenses, said Olsen.
The convention is held over the course of two weekends during the mid-summer, when, Olsen said, business at the arena is slow. He said each day of the convention brings in about 10,000 people.
“They have been, specifically through these rough economic times, pretty consistent in attendance and the amount of money they bring to the local economy,” he said. “They’ve been pretty solid from a business standpoint all seven years.”
According to city documents, the projected revenue from the 2011 event in hotel and food and beverage sales is $7.8 million. The projected tax revenue – including sales taxes – amounts to about $301,000.
Councilor Mary-Ann Baldwin said the city will contribute money to organizations that bring in that kind of economic boost to the city, especially during a slow season like August. She said that similar events include the CIAA tournament, which the city recently lost to Charlotte and the Ironman triathlon, which will be coming in the future.
The Give Back
In return, the group usually performs some kind of community service project at the arena.
Typically, Olsen said, the group will clean the building and the grounds for free, saving the arena money from hiring an outside contractor. In the past the group has also planted trees throughout the property.
But this year City Councilors say they want to see more outreach into the community.
Baldwin explained that in the past the City Council would encourage and suggest that the group to partner with other organizations in the community, but wouldn’t require it. The Jehovah’s Witnesses would instead perform some other kind of service work.
This year, she said they decided to tie the funding directly to the completion of a community service.
Councilors gave the group three options including providing support or volunteers for a local Habitat for Humanity project, Helping Hands Mission relocation or a food or clothing drive for one of the city’s food banks or shelters. The group could suggest its own partnership, but it must be approved by the City Council.
more doctors honor religious objections to blood transfusions.
october 09, 2012|by manya a. brachear, chicago tribune reporter.
as a jehovah's witness, tracy pickett always has enjoyed knocking on doors and introducing strangers to the tenets of her faith.
I bet that this article was payed...
more doctors honor religious objections to blood transfusions.
october 09, 2012|by manya a. brachear, chicago tribune reporter.
as a jehovah's witness, tracy pickett always has enjoyed knocking on doors and introducing strangers to the tenets of her faith.
More doctors honor religious objections to blood transfusions
October 09, 2012 | By Manya A. Brachear, Chicago Tribune reporter
As a Jehovah's Witness, Tracy Pickett always has enjoyed knocking on doors and introducing strangers to the tenets of her faith. But by the time she reached her mid-40s, scoliosis made every step excruciating and her spiritual mission impossible.
Walking again would require surgery that often involves tremendous blood loss and a transfusion — a medical procedure to replenish the blood supply forbidden by her church.
"Even though I love life and I don't want to die, I want good medical care without blood," said Pickett, 49, of Crown Point, Ind. "If it got to that point, I would rather lose my life than disobey my creator and take a blood transfusion."
Dr. Christopher Dewald, Pickett's orthopedic surgeon at Rush University Medical Center, nervously agreed to find alternatives and perform the surgery. Dewald said he couldn't fathom letting a patient die on his operating table, but because he respected Pickett's convictions, he invested time to explore the options.
"I explained to her that I would have a hard time letting her pass away right in front of me and that I might have a problem not giving her blood," said Dewald, a Roman Catholic. "But I was going to do everything in my power to honor her wishes."
For years, many doctors have resisted accommodating religious tenets that they believe endanger their patients. But more physicians, including Dewald, are practicing within the confines of religious restrictions, even when it might put their patients' lives at risk.
Although alternatives to transfusions have been around for years, more physicians are weighing patients' spiritual well-being and peace of mind as part of their treatment.
"In the rational realm, it doesn't necessarily make sense," said Dr. Valluvan Jeevanandam, an expert in high-risk cardiac surgery at the University of Chicago Medical Center. "But if what they believe makes them peaceful and content, I'm not going to take that away from them."
Jehovah's Witnesses cite Acts 15 in their own New World translation of the Holy Scriptures to explain their objection to blood transfusions. "Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God, but should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from blood."
Most Christians believe that verse denounces pagan rituals such as eating and drinking blood. But Jehovah's Witnesses interpret it as a prohibition on accepting blood that has been removed and stored. They also point to four verses in Leviticus and three verses in Deuteronomy to demonstrate that any blood spilled and not eaten (referring to animal blood) should not be reused, but given back to God.
Because it can be difficult to find doctors who respect the rule, the church appoints hospital liaisons to manage a database of local physicians and make referrals.
"Each major city of the world has a hospital liaison committee to bridge the gap between the Jehovah's Witness community and medical community," said T.J. Bullock, the church's liaison in Chicago. "If physicians have questions about what we accept or don't accept or are looking for advice, we can put them in touch with other physicians."
Jeevanandam has accepted many of Bullock's referrals. He said he warns every patient that the mortality rate is higher for anyone who declines blood transfusions.
"We don't have a 100 percent success rate. We do lose people," he said. "You're telling me what ammunition to use to fix your problem. If you take blood away, that's a large portion of my arsenal. There will be potential for higher complications."
Brian Montalbano, 31, of Nashville, Tenn., found Jeevanandam several years ago when he needed a second heart transplant. His first transplant at age 9, before he was a Jehovah's Witness, had involved a transfusion that also transmitted a virus, he said.
By the time he came to Jeevanandam in his late 20s, he not only remembered that rocky recovery, but also had converted to a faith that didn't allow another transfusion. However, it did allow him to get a new heart.
Montalbano encountered more complications. Shortly after the surgery, his lungs filled with fluid. Other doctors besides Jeevanandam recommended a transfusion to boost his strength. Still, he declined, resulting in a stroke that temporarily paralyzed his left side, he said.
"I believe I was making the right decision," said Montalbano, adding that he has fully recovered. "The ultimate goal is to serve God and do his will. And I believed that if I made it through, I would be doing it faithfully. Any risks that come would be worth the reward."
Dr. Hieu Ton-That, a trauma surgeon at Loyola University Medical Center, has struggled to build a critical mass of specialized colleagues who agree to avoid transfusions regardless of the outcome. He has worked to overcome the widespread misperception that Jehovah's Witnesses wholly reject medical care.
An atheist working at a Catholic hospital, Ton-That has discovered he also must overcome a clash of values.
"Obviously, there are some values that we should share as a society: preservation of life if possible, autonomy," Ton-That said. "My job is understanding where people come from and giving them access to care that's appropriate to their value system."
Ton-That has launched a hotline for patients who want to avoid blood: 708-327-0RBC (0722), which stands for "Zero Red Blood Cells."
"Everyone comes in with a framework of values and beliefs for everything including their health issues," he said. "Caregivers come with a value system too. That's why it's hard to build this network of providers because maybe the value system around here is more predominantly 'life at all costs regardless of other values.' There has to be some ground where we can accommodate both."
Dr. Kathy Johnson Neely, chair of Northwestern Memorial Hospital's medical ethics committee and an assistant professor at Northwestern University's medical school, said preserving life is the most obvious ethical obligation of doctors. Less obvious is the tenet to never abandon a patient, no matter where that patient's illness and choices lead, she said. And that tension can create a dilemma for doctors, she said.
"I have an absolute obligation to listen to what my patient says no to and respect that and not violate their body if they say no," she said. "I also have an absolute obligation to help my patient get better. There are situations in life and in medicine when we can't fulfill one without violating another."
Dewald faced that conundrum when Pickett walked into his office earlier this year. And, he acknowledged, he never quite resolved it.
While he agreed to do the surgery, he also referred Pickett to a hematologist to increase her blood count in advance. Once in the operating room, he used a Cell Saver, or cell salvage machine that suctions, washes and filters blood so it can be recirculated instead of thrown away. Jehovah's Witnesses believe such machines act as an extension of the circulatory system, so blood doesn't leave the body.
To control any blood loss, he divided the complex procedure into two separate operations. By the time he walked into the operating room, he felt confident that both surgeries would be a success.
But Dewald said Pickett's convictions prompted him to contemplate his own Catholic beliefs.
"It helped me to be introspective about what my beliefs were in terms of facing that problem. Could I let someone die?" he said. "I would've had a hard time walking out of the operating room. A plan was not in place. I'm not sure what I would do. I never completed that sentence."
Twitter: @TribSeeker
follow the link and see the list of participants who stated (p.4 - end of the list/right side):.
http://www.imn.org/2012/etm1324/pdfs/etm1324_prospectus.pdf.
amaze yourself, because it is only as the chief investment officer of the watchtower bible and tract society!.
What is HEDGE FUNDS:
Hedge funds are typically open-ended, meaning that investors can invest and withdraw money at regular, specified intervals. The value of an investment in a hedge fund is calculated as a share of the fund's net asset value, meaning that increases and decreases in the value of the fund's investment assets (and fund expenses) are directly reflected in the amount an investor can later withdraw.
Most hedge fund investment strategies aim to achieve a positive return on investment whether markets are rising or falling. Hedge fund managers typically invest their own money in the fund they manage, which serves to align their interests with investors in the fund. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] A hedge fund typically pays its investment manager a management fee, which is a percentage of the assets of the fund, and a performance fee if the fund's net asset value increases during the year. Some hedge funds have a net asset value of several billion dollars. As of 2009, hedge funds represented 1.1% of the total funds and assets held by financial institutions. [ 3 ] As of April 2012, the estimated size of the global hedge fund industry was US$2.13 trillion. [ 4 ]
Because hedge funds are not sold to the public or retail investors, the funds and their managers have historically not been subject to the same restrictions that govern other funds and investment fund managers with regard to how the fund may be structured and how strategies and techniques are employed. Regulations passed in the United States and Europe after the 2008 credit crisis are intended to increase government oversight of hedge funds and eliminate certain regulatory gaps. [ 5 ]
the high court has ordered that a member of the jehovah's witnesses in need of urgent surgical treatment can receive certain blood transfusion products despite objections from her husband on religious grounds.. .
the 27-year-old woman was admitted to a dublin hospital yesterday suffering from acute abdominal pain and later collapsed, the court was told.. she had a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and had lost a significant amount of blood, which was replaced with recycled blood from the woman using a system known as "cell salvage".. the court was told she is now sedated and unable to express her wishes and will continue in that state until a certain procedure is carried out to prevent serious infection, but which could involve further bleeding and the need for a transfusion.. that must be done tomorrow morning, the court heard.. a dispute had arisen between her husband and the hospital over her wishes, the court was told.. eileen barrington sc, for the hospital, said the woman had told doctors, when first admitted to hospital, that she was refusing a transfusion of whole blood or red blood cells but would accept platelets or plasma.. her emotional husband told the court yesterday his wife had signed a document used by jehovah's witnesses, known as the advanced care directive, declaring she would never accept platelets or plasma even if her life was in danger.. he believed, because his wife was in such terrible pain, it was really hard for her to reason but it was one of their core beliefs not to accept primary blood components of red or white blood cells or plasma and platelets, although she would accept "minor fractions" of blood.. he knew his wife of eight years well and she had filled in three advanced care directives over a number of years stating this, the most recent being august 2012, he said.. "at a time when she cannot make up her mind, that is what it [the directive] is there for.".
ms barrington said the hospital was contending that the wishes expressed by the woman to doctors yesterday evening over-rode the wishes expressed in the directive.. the hospital wanted an order permitting it make the appropriate transfusion for the procedure referred to because, without that option, doctors had said there was a risk of death or serious lifelong disability.. as part of her treatment when first admitted to hospital, abdominal "packs" were inserted which put pressure on the blood vessels to prevent bleeding, counsel said.. those packs must be removed within 36 hours and there was a risk of further bleeding in this procedure.. granting an order allowing the hospital administer non-red blood transfusions, mr justice roderick murphy said it seemed to him, from evidence given to the court by treating doctors, the woman had the capacity the amend the advanced care directive when she told doctors yesterday that she would accept plasma or platelets.. he granted the hospital the order sought.. .
The High Court has ordered that a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses in need of urgent surgical treatment can receive certain blood transfusion products despite objections from her husband on religious grounds.
The 27-year-old woman was admitted to a Dublin hospital yesterday suffering from acute abdominal pain and later collapsed, the court was told.
She had a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and had lost a significant amount of blood, which was replaced with recycled blood from the woman using a system known as "cell salvage".
The court was told she is now sedated and unable to express her wishes and will continue in that state until a certain procedure is carried out to prevent serious infection, but which could involve further bleeding and the need for a transfusion.
That must be done tomorrow morning, the court heard.
A dispute had arisen between her husband and the hospital over her wishes, the court was told.
Eileen Barrington SC, for the hospital, said the woman had told doctors, when first admitted to hospital, that she was refusing a transfusion of whole blood or red blood cells but would accept platelets or plasma.
Her emotional husband told the court yesterday his wife had signed a document used by Jehovah's Witnesses, known as the Advanced Care Directive, declaring she would never accept platelets or plasma even if her life was in danger.
He believed, because his wife was in such terrible pain, it was really hard for her to reason but it was one of their core beliefs not to accept primary blood components of red or white blood cells or plasma and platelets, although she would accept "minor fractions" of blood.
He knew his wife of eight years well and she had filled in three Advanced Care Directives over a number of years stating this, the most recent being August 2012, he said.
"At a time when she cannot make up her mind, that is what it [the directive] is there for."
Ms Barrington said the hospital was contending that the wishes expressed by the woman to doctors yesterday evening over-rode the wishes expressed in the directive.
The hospital wanted an order permitting it make the appropriate transfusion for the procedure referred to because, without that option, doctors had said there was a risk of death or serious lifelong disability.
As part of her treatment when first admitted to hospital, abdominal "packs" were inserted which put pressure on the blood vessels to prevent bleeding, counsel said.
Those packs must be removed within 36 hours and there was a risk of further bleeding in this procedure.
Granting an order allowing the hospital administer non-red blood transfusions, Mr Justice Roderick Murphy said it seemed to him, from evidence given to the court by treating doctors, the woman had the capacity the amend the Advanced Care Directive when she told doctors yesterday that she would accept plasma or platelets.
He granted the hospital the order sought.
http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/1016/blood-transfusion-jehovahs-witness.htmlhi y'all, just wanted to let you know i was out for a stroll on my bicycle for exercise last week and got hit by a car 100 yards from my house.
it was a hit and run.
i got up with only minor bruises but felt really dizzy and asked one of my roommates to take me to the hospital as i was dizzy and felt i was going to pass out on the spot in the middle of the street.
I'm happy that You feel better Randy.
Keeping You in my prayers!
follow the link and see the list of participants who stated (p.4 - end of the list/right side):.
http://www.imn.org/2012/etm1324/pdfs/etm1324_prospectus.pdf.
amaze yourself, because it is only as the chief investment officer of the watchtower bible and tract society!.
For me this all about hipocrisy!!!